 |
Logic Discussion Board
Christian Logic and the Logical Defense
of the Faith
THE POWER OF GOD
Even the DAMNED can save in the NAME OF JESUS
Mother Teresa: Come
Be My Light
This discussion was removed from
a
"catholic" forum
when the topic turned to Free Will.
|
|
| Author |
Message |
tom
Joined: 08 Sep 2004
Posts: 255
Location: Tallinn, Estonia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2004 6:37 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
SC,
I fail to see your arguments for assertion that by declaring Mary
Immaculate Catholic Church denies her free will. So I quit.
May God bless you.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Stephen
Joined: 28 Sep 2004
Posts: 350
|
Posted: Sat Dec 25, 2004 11:11 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Tom,
Just to let you know you have a true friend in the Protestant
Church, I don't believe Mary was born in sin either. It was obvious
that God saw her as a special women, who most likely had obeyed God
from first light of moral agency just as I believe Enoch and Elijah
most likely had done, and was most likely sinless when the angel came
to her with the sin shattering news! "Mary, God has chosen you to bear
the The Savior of the world!" She was indeed blessed, as Elizabeth,
filled with the Holy Spirit proclaimed,. “Lu 1:41 And it came to pass,
that, when Elisabeth heard the salutation of Mary, the babe leaped in
her womb; and Elisabeth was filled with the Holy Ghost:
42 And she spake out with a loud voice, and said, Blessed art thou
among women, and blessed is the fruit of thy womb!”
Thank the Lord for the pure lives of Mary, and I believe Joseph as
well. If some feel it is heretical to believe such, count me in with
those that believe it. I always liked your company Tom 
_________________
For the sake of finding truth,
Stephen |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jzyehoshua
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 8:54 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Well, then,
let's make this a 2 on 2.
I'm writing a letter to an RCC priest with questions about the RCC
beliefs, here's what I have so far just about Mary:
MARY
Q: Why is it Mary's name is mentioned 10 times in a Hail Mary for every
one "Our Father" when her name is mentioned once in the New Testament
for every 50 times that Christ's is mentioned?
Q: If Luke 2:43 means Mary was the mother of the Lord doesn't
Galatians mean James was the brother of the Lord by the same reasoning?
Q: In Matthew 12:46-50, how can brethren mean disciples when verse
50 contrasts them with His disciples? And doesn't verse 50 show that
the only family position a believer can not have with Him is that of
Father?
Q: In Luke 11:27-28 doesn't Christ say Mary's body gives her no
greater a blessing than what any believer can have through keeping
God's Word?
Q: Why must any but the Jews, who are concerned with signs of the
Messiah, know Mary's name, for doesn't Acts 4:12 show we need to know
Christ's name alone to be saved?
Q: Isn't John 2:1-7 representing Christ denying Mary as having parental
authority rather than affirming it? In verse 4 we see Him not obeying
(not disrespect) simply because she asked Him, because she asked Him as
having that authority, it was when she set it aside and said the one
commandment we have from her in the Bible, "Whatsoever he saith unto
you, do it" and acknowledged His authority that He complied.
Q: In Revelation 2 women are mentioned, one the woman clothed with 12
stars, the sun and the moon (Revelation 12), and the other the harlot
of Babylon (Revelation 17). If we are told in Revelation 17:18 that the
harlot is symbolic of the great city "which reigneth over the kings of
the earth," why then should the other woman not be symbolic as well? It
would seem she is tied to Israel for in Genesis 37:9-10 we see Joseph's
dream of his brothers as 11 stars (he would make the 12th) who would
seem to be the 12 tribes of Israel, and his parents as the sun and the
moon.
Q: Why did Mary have to be sinless to bear Christ instead of simply
being a virgin? If God was powerful enough to keep Mary "pure" then
wouldn't the same God be powerful enough for Jesus to be born without
being infected with sin as well? If Mary had to be sinless for Jesus to
be holy then wouldn't it mean that Mary's mother had to be holy as well
and so on and so forth all the way back to Eve?
Q: How can Mary be a co-redemptress as Pope Benedict XV said while
Colossians 2:10 is true? According to Philippians 2:10-11, she too must
bow the knee to Christ, how then can she be a co-redemptress? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jzyehoshua
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Feb 18, 2005 9:04 am
Post subject: |
|
|
Note the 2nd
to last question.
Why did Mary have to be sinless to bear Christ instead of simply being
a virgin? If God was powerful enough to keep Mary "pure" then wouldn't
the same God be powerful enough for Jesus to be born without being
infected with sin as well? If Mary had to be sinless for Jesus to be
holy then wouldn't it mean that Mary's mother had to be holy as well
and so on and so forth all the way back to Eve?
Yes, Mary was blessed to be used by God as a doorway for Him to enter
into the world but if she had refused to be used as such He'd have just
found someone else as SC pointed out already.
As for Mary being sinless, how can anyone but God be sinless? Christ
Himself said there is none good but God. Just because we have the same
word interpreted perfect doesn't mean it means perfect in the sense we
think of. David was said to have a perfect heart in 1 Kings 11:4 yet
his sins were great.
We interpret the word in James 2:19-20 as faith yet we see from verse
19 that it is meant in the sense of intellectual orthodoxy, or belief
that there is one God, and not as Paul uses it in Ephesians 2:8-10 and
Romans 10:8-10, or trust in Christ alone to the extent of full
commitment to Him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Siorfin
Joined: 25 Feb 2005
Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Feb 25, 2005 3:14 am
Post subject: |
|
|
| The
answer to your question scripturally is simple. God says that He
controls everything and there is nothing done without His approval and
there is no possible way to frustrate any purpose He sets out to do. If
Mary had said no and God wanted her to bear Christ she would have
beared Christ regardless of her saying no. The proper question to ask
is if Mary had said no would God have made her bear Christ anyways or
would He have waited until He changed her heart, like Jonah for
instance, before concieving Christ within her. Regardless if God choose
her to do something she WILL do it and that is that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
a.c.bell
Joined: 28 Mar 2005
Posts: 7
|
Posted: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:04 pm
Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
| God
has free will, therefore, we too have free will. For God to presume on
your decisions, to co-op them (confine them to a limited area) is a
betrayal of your free will. He would not limit Himself so. And He did
not limit you this way either. For He gave you His dignity, His image,
His likeness. |
Prove it, we may need to start a new thread, but claiming it true
doesn't make it true. You are attacking a Group of people becuase you
can't seem to reconcile God's sovereignty and man's ability to make
decisions. Please support your arguments. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
All times are GMT
Goto pageGoto
page 1, 2, 3,
4, 5
|
| Page 3
of 5 |
Powered by phpBB 2.0.11 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
subGreen style by ktauber
|